购置款抵押权的竞存对抗规则研究

满足《民法典》第416条要件的购置款抵押权可以对抗公示在先的固定担保权,此种处理模式虽使外部债权人负担一定审查成本,但总体上符合利益衡量视角下的比例原则。《民法典》在浮动抵押领域中采取“登记主义”的立场,与“超级优先权规则”形成了体系性的规范协调。购置款抵押权与留置权竞存时,后者始终处于优先受偿顺位。在功能主义视角下,所有权保留和融资租赁可准用超级优先权规则,但应作必要限制。购置款抵押权人不得对抗正常经营活动中已经支付合理价款并取得抵押财产的买受人。《民法典》未明文确立担保权收益延伸规则,但在理论层面上仍尚有将其纳入现行法体系的解释空间,且民事主体可在商业实践中通过意思自治达致类似效果。     

双向汲取:社区社会组织的行动路径分析

社会组织是推动国家治理体系和治理能力现代化的重要力量。聚焦社会组织行动策略研究,能够更好地揭示外部制度环境制约下的社会组织参与基层社会治理的微观运行机制。运用"制度环境-行动策略-行动目标-行动任务"的分析框架,着重探讨社会组织与基层政府、社区居委会、社区居民之间的复杂互动关系,剖析复杂制度环境下社会组织行为策略选择及其多元化行动路径。S市G组织的个案研究表明,G组织通过"双向汲取"的行动策略能够实现社会组织行政性目标与社会性目标的双重目标达成。由于G组织接受任务的不同行动目标来源以及不同任务之间的相关性程度差异,使得G组织"双向汲取"行动策略呈现出复杂制度结构约束下的多元化行动路径。     

Conflicts of customary land tenure in rural Africa: is large-scale land acquisition a driver of ‘institutional innovation’?

This study combines legal and anthropological approaches to investigate how the establishment of a large-scale biofuel agro-industry is reinterpreting and potentially transforming customary institutional arrangements in rural Sierra Leone. The contractual relationships established between land acquirers and local authorities can be seen as an ‘institutional innovation’ that aims at interpreting and overcoming the limits of the national land regime. However, by formalizing customary land tenure structures through land registration, such innovations are exacerbating pre-existing social inequalities. We identified four categories of resulting conflicts: interlineage, intervillage, interfamily and intergenerational conflicts. Taken together, these conflicts question the current land-based sociopolitical structures of rural Sierra Leone and could be drivers of societal change.     

论意思表示瑕疵与善意取得规定之关系

在通谋虚伪表示及被欺诈之情形,民法关于＂不得对抗善意第三人＂之规定与善意取得制度应可并存。而于胁迫之情形,＂撤销得对抗善意第三人＂应优先于善意取得而适用,盖惟如此方可践行私法自治之原则。在意思表示错误之情形,不发生意思表示瑕疵与善意取得之关系问题,善意第三人可径直依善意取得而主张其权利。第三人若知悉其前手交易之可撤销性,其非但不得主张＂撤销不得对抗善意第三人＂,亦不得主张依善意取得而受保护。     

论交易中遗失物的物权归属——评《物权法》第107条

《物权法》第107条规定了交易环境下的遗失物的物权归属。从价值层面看,该条秉承了近现代以来民法兼顾遗失人所有权保护和受让人交易安全的立法精神,但是该条的语义不明,引发了对该条的理解上的歧义,并由此导致遗失物权利归属的不明确和对遗失人权利保护的不利;而且没有对货币和有价证券等特殊动产做例外规定。对其不足,应在借鉴其他国家相关立法的基础上适时予以修正。     

从善意取得和表见代理制度谈另一种法律思维方式

关于善意取得的性质,有原始取得和继受取得之争。因为继受取得是基于他人既存的权利而取得物权,而善意取得中处分人欠缺处分权,以至处分人当然不享有物权,因而原始取得说成为通说。但是,原始取得说强调的是事实上是否有处分权,而笔者认为,不妨直接由第三人的视角定性善意取得为继受取得,补足处分权,因为是否存在处分权这一事实一开始对于第三人而言就是不存在的,是事后才了解的,而事后的了解是没有即时的法律意义的。本文以定性善意取得为起点,结合表见代理,对传统上纯粹由事实层面分析问题的思路提出质疑,并提出从另一个角度来思考问题的模式。     

A study of user data integrity during acquisition of Android devices

At the time of this writing, Android devices are widely used, and many studies considering methods of forensic acquisition of data from Android devices have been conducted. Similarly, a diverse collection of smartphone forensic tools has also been introduced. However, studies conducted thus far do not normally guarantee data integrity required for digital forensic investigations. Therefore, this work uses a previously proposed method of Android device acquisition utilizing ‘Recovery Mode’. This work evaluates Android Recovery Mode variables that potentially compromise data integrity at the time of data acquisition. Based on the conducted analysis, an Android data acquisition tool that ensures the integrity of acquired data is developed, which is demonstrated in a case study to test tool's ability to preserve data integrity.     

从概念迁移角度看语言迁移研究中的术语

第二语言习得中关于语言迁移研究的术语存在混乱的现象。从概念迁移角度分析并重新界定诸如正向迁移、正迁移、负迁移、反向迁移等术语，可以看出，正向迁移和反向迁移描述语言迁移的过程，而正迁移和负迁移描述迁移的结果。     

An evaluation platform for forensic memory acquisition software

Memory forensics has gradually moved into the focus of researchers and practitioners alike in recent years. With an increasing effort to extract valuable information from a snapshot of a computer's RAM, the necessity to properly assess the respective solutions rises as well. In this paper, we present an evaluation platform for forensic memory acquisition software. The platform is capable of measuring distinct factors that determine the quality of a generated memory image, specifically its correctness, atomicity, and integrity. Tests are performed for three popular open source applications, win32dd, WinPMEM, and mdd, as well as for different memory sizes.     

有限公司股权善意取得规则的司法适用

2011年最高法院发布的《公司法司法解释三》第26条、第28条正式为股权善意取得确立了规范基础,但在适用情形、构成要件及法律效果方面均不清晰,给司法适用带来很多困难。结合现有规范及实务经验,股权的善意取得规则在司法适用上应以最类似的不动产所有权作为参照对象,通过对股权善意取得的具体适用情形、构成要件及法律效果进行细致分析,可以得出股权善意取得制度具有现实可操作性的结论。